Travis Holland

    18 Jul 2011

    Visual.ly of @travisaholland vs @MegAgain

    10 Jul 2011

    We are so close http://goo.gl/peOs6

    We are so close http://goo.gl/peOs6

    2 Jun 2011

    Coal Seam Gas Concerns

    DRAMATIC footage of a foamy discharge from a coal seam gas well in south western Sydney has added to concerns around the controversial industry.
    The video, filmed by a Greens member of the New South Wales parliament, appears to show an unidentified foamy chemical mix being forcefully expelled from the well.
    Greens MP Jeremy Buckingham, who filmed the video expressed concern about the location of nearby housing and water facilities and called on the NSW Government to investigate the incident.
    The incident came amongst growing opposition in Australia to the controversial industry, which uses a broad mix of chemicals to force gas up from within underground coal seams.
    For Buckingham and others concerned about the environmental impacts, especially of pollutants, from the coal seam gas industry, the discharge provides further impetus to question existing practices.
    In parliament, Buckingham’s questions to Duncan Gay, who represents the Energy and Resources Minister in the Upper House, were met with obfustication.
    Gay responded to Buckingham’s request for a government inquiry into the industry by stating: “the Government provides a number of attractive incentives to encourage exploration, development and utilisation of the coal seam gas industry” and promised to refer to “refer the question to the relevant Minister.”
    Community groups in areas such as the NSW Southern Highlands have embarked on vocal campaigns opposing coal seam gas extraction.
    Hume Coal, a joint venture between Korean steel-maker POSCO and Australian-owned Cockatoo Coal, is conducting exploratory activities around the Southern Highlands town of Sutton Forest.
    Hume’s activities are being closely monitored and scrutinised by the Southern Highlands Coal Action Group (SCAG’s), whose “Shoo Cockatoo” campaign has crystalised local opposition to the project.
    SCAG’s activities are also being closely monitored - by Hume Coal.
    The company noted strong community opposition in their Review of Environmental (REF) factors prepared for the NSW Government as part of the exploration application.
    They gave an account of SCAG’s history, and noted the group’s primary concern related to future mining activities, not to exploration.
    The REF says community concerns “subsidence damage, dust and noise from surface facilities, damage to the aquifers and water supply catchment, changes in the character of the area and property values.”
    Coal seam gas mining is not the only source of anxiety. As the Hume Coal REF notes, objections to the Sutton Forest activities “largely revolve around future mining”.
    Such mining is likely to include long wall extraction of hard coking coal for export.
    The community’s fears are not unfounded. A 2008 NSW Government inquiry into the impact of mining on natural features of the Southern Coalfield found there is every likelihood of  surface damage when mining occurs.
    The report notes, “With few exceptions, at depths of cover greater than about 200 m coal cannot be mined economically by any mining method without causing some degree of surface subsidence”.
    Hume Coal’s REF shows the Wongawilli Coal Seam lies at a depth of almost 200 metres, indicating a strong probability of effects such as surface subsidence.
    The report also states “non-conventional subsidence effects (including valley closure, upsidence and regional far-field horizontal displacement) regularly occur” in the Southern Coalfield.
    In the Illawarra region, which also has a long history of coal mining activities, an estimated 3000 people recently participated in a beach-side protest against coal seam gas proposals.
    That protest was sparked by plans by mining company Apex Energy to drill 15 exploratory boreholes in their search for coal seam gas.
    Apex’s preliminary environmental assessment, prepared for the NSW Government in 2007, shows an exploratory lease covering most of the Illawarra region north of Lake Illawarra.
    Community group Stop CSG Illawarra has expressed concern on the impact of these wells, and resultant mining operations, on the quality of water, food and amenity in their region.
    The group also suggest significant environmental impacts of coal seam mining, a contention supported by a determination of the NSW Scientific Committee, which is established by the Threatened Species Conservation Act.
    In recommending protection for Coastal Upland Swamp environments, which are abundant throughout the Illawarra (and the Apex Energy licence area), the committee notes coal seam gas mining is likely to have “significant environmental impacts on hydrological and ecological functions of Coastal Upland Swamp”.
    The recently-elected NSW Coalition Government has imposed a 60-day moratorium on new exploration licences for coal seam gas, which started on May 21.
    The moratorium was imposed to allow the Government to develop a new strategic land-use policy.
    However, the freeze has no effect on existing licences, as residents in the Southern Highlands discovered when Hume Coal began their exploration hours before the moratorium was announced.

    31 May 2011

    Coal seam gas concerns stoked by foamy discharge

    21 Mar 2011

    ARL vs NRL

    I just received this email from someone who often sends me these kinds of emails. Many of them are funny. They brighten your day up. But, then, many are just like this one. Have a read of it and see my comments at the bottom.

    36 have been accused of spouse abuse 
    7
     have been arrested for fraud
    19
     have been accused of writing bad cheques   
    117
     have directly or indirectly bankrupted at  least 2 businesses   
    3
     have done time for assault 
    71,
      repeat 71   cannot  get a credit card due to bad credit 
    14
     have been arrested on drug-related charges 
    8
     have been arrested for shoplifting 
    21
     currently are defendants in lawsuits and
    84
     have been arrested for drunk driving in the last year 
     

    Can
       you guess which organization this is? AFL? NRL? 
     

    Give
       up yet? .…. .   Scroll down 
     
     

     

    Neither,
     
     
    it’s the 535
     members of the AUSTRALIAN PARLIAMENT in   CANBERRA 


    The
      same  group of Idiots that crank out hundreds of new laws each year, designed to keep the rest of us in line. 

    You’ve
       got to pass this one on!

    Well, no, I haven’t got to pass this on. Mostly, because it is completely wrong and foolish. There are only 226 members of the Australian parliament (150 in the House of Reps and 76 in the Senate). But guess what? In the United States, there are 435 members of Congress and 100 Senators, for a total of 535 in that parliament.

    I can’t vouch for the validity or otherwise of the other numbers in this email, but if it has that one - the punchline - so wrong, I wouldn’t count on anything else being correct.

    This type of email is whats wrong with the internet.

    27 Feb 2011

    Why Bob Carr is Sadly Mistaken

    In a recent post on his often-rambling blog, former NSW Premier Bob Carr begs for preferences from those intending to vote for the Greens on March 26. Carr tries to scare voters into delivering their preferences to Labor after the Greens by invoking the threats of a demonic far right parliamentary consortium of the Coalition, the Shooter’s Party and the Christian Democrats.

    He also outlines what he perceives as Labor’s environmental successes from the last four years. Such successes seem to particularly include locking up thousands of hectares of forests. They are worthy achievements, but, unfortunately for Carr, do not amount to what they seem. Carr conveniently ignores the nasty, symbiotic relationship between the Shooters’ Party and Labor over the past four years. This relationship has lead to environmental degradation and harm. His poxy memory extends to the “bullets for votes” deal detailed by The Australian. In that particular article, the paper ruminated on Labor’s decision to allow excision of more than a thousand fire-prone hectares from a State Park to create a giant new regional shooting centre on the site of an existing small local rifle range. The relationship between Labor and the Shooters’ Party is further discussed by this Sydney Morning Herald article - one of many - about a bill proposing to allow hunting in National Parks. It leads: “Hunters will be allowed to shoot animals in national parks for the first time under a deal offered to the Shooters’ Party by the NSW Government.”

    It is unfortunate that Mr Carr, despite his intellect and experience, is so obsessed with re-election of his failing government (and I believe it is still very much his government despite his retirement) that he can simply forget history in penning this particular blog.

    1 Feb 2011

    Surround and Conquer

    When I tire of politics and media, I blog on sport over at The Big Tip. My first article there was posted on January 2. It discusses what the NRL must consider in expansion attempts. Also, if it is the most viewed article in the next few days, I score a neat $200. So, if you’re interested or just feel like helping me out, take a look at ‘Surround and Conquer’.

    3 Jan 2011

    Decline in Rural Media

    Australia’s population is mostly cloistered into densely populated east coast cities and surrounding areas such as the Sydney basin, Melbourne and South East Queensland (including Brisbane and the Gold Coast). Yet, despite the statistical affinity for urban and suburban life, our national character (if it can be defined) remains rooted in ideas of rurality and the bush. This self-concept was further reinforced by the (admittedly rare) occurence of rural issues taking centre stage in the recent federal election, and especially during the post-election scramble to form government, where three rural independents seemed the key to power. But amongst that outburst of regional sentiment, and within the picture of general journalistic decay, little attention has been paid to how modern stories of Australia’s rural character are constructed and carried in the media. University of Canberra media and communications lecturer Jason Wilson argues in an academic piece that decline in rural media has preceded the present ‘crisis’ in metropolitan and national mainstream media publications. On the ABC’s The Drum, Wilson responded more forcefully to comments of former Fairfax chief Brian McCarthy, who had suggested that his Rural Press division would suffer from the ABC’s attempts to stimulate more rural media production through ABC Open. Wilson’s comments included the following broadside:

    Rural Press has done very little with online offerings across its stable, and certainly has shown no signs of wanting to act as a curator of community-derived content, as ABC Open is proposing to do. The average Rural Press site contains a stripped back version of the daily newspaper’s content (so as not to disincentivise purchase of the paper copy) and a rudimentary comment facility. There’s nothing to suggest that Rural Press wants to lead regional communities into a greater engagement with participatory newsmaking


    Wilson’s comments here were made in the context of discussing the ABC’s role in the Australian media landscape, but they point to a broader concern about rural media in general. It is a concern I share. In my hometown, I have seen the local newspaper face cutback after cutback to the space available to local stories in favour of advertising. From my brief in-office experience, these reductions were forced from the top by ever-tightening corporate budgets. At the same time, few stories were placed online and Rural Press made no apparent effort to create or facilitate participatory newsmaking within the community. Instead, the company seems intent on controlling its own market share, in contrast to worldwide trends in journalism and news in general. Wilson notes the tendency to assume rural and regional media will be filled by consumer-created content, especially as facilitated by the NBN:

    The digital future… here forecasts a spontaneous, bottom-up localism, where citizens will come together to produce news and public affairs content that the mainstream media no longer provide.


    However, he questions the merit in this assumption. Instead, rural communities may need stimulation and encouragement beyond technological changes to begin actively producing local stories. Regional communities could do well from adopting a community news approach, where local content is owned and produced by local people, but the development of this would require significant investment, both in finances and time, from those same local people. Until then, the decline of regional mainstream media may continue unabated with almost no adequate replacement.